Previous | Contents | Next | ||
Issues in Science and Technology
Librarianship |
Fall 2000 |
|||
DOI:10.5062/F4542KKF |
URLs in this document have been updated. Links enclosed in {curly brackets} have been changed. If a replacement link was located, the new URL was added and the link is active; if a new site could not be identified, the broken link was removed. |
Elizabeth Young
Assistant Coordinator, Technical Services
SUNY Oswego
Oswego, NY 13126
Editor's note: This article is a companion to "Free Scholarly Electronic Journals: How Good Are They?" which appeared in the Summer 2000 issue.
[Biological Sciences/Agriculture] [Engineering/Computers/Technology] [Mathematics] [Medicine] [Physical Sciences] [STM Education] [Interdisciplinary/Complex Systems] [Directories of E-journals]
Free scholarly electronic journals form a small but important, and growing, segment of the science, technology, and medicine (STM) information landscape. Roes (1994) was able to identify 39 peer-reviewed scholarly electronic journals, and, by 1996 Harter and Kim (1996) and Hitchcock, Carr, and Hall (1996) found 77 and 115 such titles, respectively. In 1997, ARL's Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters, and Academic Discussion Lists (7th Edition) claimed 1,002 peer-reviewed e-journals (Mogge 1997). Of these electronic journals, Hitchcock, Carr, and Hall (1996) found 47 out of 83 STM titles investigated were free and planned to stay freely accessible. Looking at all disciplines, Harter and Kim (1996) found almost 90% of e-journals were free in their study. With the increase in commercial publishers entering the electronic journal market, the numbers have changed considerably, and Fosmire and Young (in press) found only 213 out of 1,209 (18%) of scholarly journals are free, with ~125 coming from the STM disciplines. The absolute increase in the number of free scholarly electronic journals shows that the genre is still viable despite the increasing commercial presence in the field of electronic publishing.
In spite of their impact on the information landscape (Harter 1998), these free electronic journals are underutilized and underappreciated by the library community (Fosmire and Young in press), perhaps due to the lack of publicity and marketing that goes hand in hand with the low budgets of these innovative enterprises. The authors see this webliography as one way to increase the visibility of these journals, especially at a time when the library community is very concerned with the spiraling costs of STM serials. Providing access to, perhaps publicizing, those titles you find to be scholarly enough and within the subject scope of your libraries will reward the efforts of the publishers and editors for their efforts to reduce the impact of the serials crisis.
As with any Internet resource, this webliography is only a snapshot of the free scholarly electronic journal literature. Every attempt was made, however, to make this list as comprehensive as possible. Several directories of electronic journals were consulted to create this list. However, none of these directories provided a complete, up-to-date, picture of the state of free scholarly electronic publishing. And none of the directories provides information on where a journal is indexed or annotations about the scope and nature of the journal. This webliography, then, provides information available nowhere else.
Once a valid free scholarly electronic journal has been identified, the journal's web site was searched to find a statement of the scope or mission of the journal (all the scope statements in this webliography are taken verbatim or with very small editing from the journal's web site). Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory was consulted to determine where the journal has been indexed, and several individual indexes were also independently consulted (MathSciNet, INSPEC, CINAHL, Agricola, Medline, GeoRef, and Web of Science), as Ulrich's does not contain all the titles in this webliography, nor does it necessarily show all the A+I services that index the journal. The list of indexing services in not meant to be comprehensive, rather, it gives a flavor of the kinds of indexes that cover that journal.
Harter, Stephen P. 1998. "Scholarly communication and electronic journals: an impact study." Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49.6: 507-516.
Harter, Stephen P. and Kim, Hak Joon. 1996. "Electronic journals and scholarly communication: a citation and reference study." Proceedings of the Midyear Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, San Diego, CA, May 20-22, 1996: 299-315. [Online.] Available {http://php.indiana.edu/~harter/harter-asis96midyear.html}. [October 2, 2000].
Hitchcock, Steve, Carr, Leslie, and Hall, Wendy. 1996. "A survey of STM online journals 1990-95: the calm before the storm." [Online.] Available: http://journals.ecs.soton.ac.uk/survey/survey.html. [October 2, 2000].
Mogge, Dru, editor. 1997. Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters, and Academic Discussion Lists, 7th edition. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries. [Online.] Available: {http://db.arl.org/index.html} [November 2, 2000].
Roes, Hans. 1994. "Electronic journals: a survey of the literature and the net." Journal of Information Networking 2.3 (1994): 169-186. [Online.] Available: {http://cwis.kub.nl/~dbi/users/roes/articles/ej_join.htm}. [October 2, 2000].
Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory. 38th Ed. (2000) New York, Bowker.
Previous | Contents | Next |